State v. Morris
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtFort, J.
Defendant was convicted of receiving and concealing stolen property. ORS 165.045. He appeals, assigning as error the trial court’s overruling of a motion for acquittal based on the insufficiency of ' the evidence.
On February 10, 1968, the dwelling of one Harold Prisbee was burglarized. Several items were token, one of which was a Benrus watch. Defendant was arrested three days later, February 18, on an unrelated charge. He was found to have in his possession a watch which was subsequently identified by Frisbee to be that which was taken during the burglary of his home.
Thereafter the defendant…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- State v. GannOregon Supreme Court · 1969
- Schroeder v. SchaeferOregon Supreme Court · 1970
- State v. LongOregon Supreme Court · 1966
- State v. DosterOregon Supreme Court · 1967
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- State v. TrowbridgeIdaho Supreme Court · 1975
- State v. PickensCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1971
- State v. TrowbridgeIdaho Supreme Court · 1975