Legal Opinion

State v. Nix

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided December 9, 1971No. 7089PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtThornton, J.

Co-defendants Nix and Brown were convicted of receiving and concealing stolen copper telephone wire in violation of ORS 165.045. ① Nix appeals, contending that the evidence was insufficient to establish that he knew or had good reason to believe that the telephone wire had been stolen and, therefore, the trial court erred in denying his motion for a judgment of acquittal.

The trial judge denied a motion for a judgment of acquittal at the close of the state’s case. Defendant elected not to stand on his motion and presented evidence in his defense. In such a case the denial of the motion may…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. LivingstonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1970
  2. State v. GardnerOregon Supreme Court · 1962
  3. State v. LamphereOregon Supreme Court · 1963
  4. State v. LongOregon Supreme Court · 1966
  5. State v. FreemanCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1971

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. State v. JorgensenCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1971
  2. State v. HolmesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1974
  3. State v. RedemanCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1972
  4. State v. BilsborrowCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2009
  5. Smith v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1973

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API