Legal Opinion
Frankel v. Lull Engineering Company
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided October 22, 1971No. Civ. A. 40217PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
FULLAM, District Judge.
Before the Court in this personal injury action are defendants’ post-trial motions.
The action arose out of an accident at a construction site on July 24,1965, when a high-lift loader overturned and crushed plaintiff’s decedent, the loader’s operator. Defendant Ransome was the dealer who sold the machine to the contractor, Guido Carl Recchia, the third party defendant, who employed plaintiff’s decedent. Defendant Lull was the manufacturer of the machine.
The following facts are essentially undisputed. Plaintiff’s decedent, Anthony Recchia, employed by his…
2Cases cited40 opinions
- Smith v. Bell Telephone Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
- Larrison v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1928
- Builders Supply Co. v. McCabeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
- Neville Chemical Company v. Union Carbide CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1970
- Edward C. Denneny and Catherine Denneny v. Bernard Siegel, Louis H. Block and the Albert Einstein Medical CenterCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1969
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Arthur Wayne Carson, Cross-Appellee v. Officer Polley, Cross-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1982
- Johnson v. Johnson Chemical Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
- Dimond v. Caterpillar Tractor Co.California Court of Appeal · 1976
- George v. Morgan Construction Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1975
- Deborah A. Eshbach, a Minor, by Her Parent and Natural Guardian, Marlin Eshbach v. W. T. Grant's and Company v. E. T. Rugg, a Division of Mid-Con, Inc., Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1973
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.