Paddock-Hawley Iron Co. v. Graham
Missouri Court of Appeals
Appeal from the St. Louis City Circuit Court. — Hon. James E. Withrow, Judge. (1) This court has no jurisdiction of this case, as the appeal has not been perfected as required by the statutes, there being no final judgment, and the statute requiring a bond to be given in appeals of this character. R. S. 1889, sec. 562 ; Jordan v. Wickham, 21 Mo. App. 536; Duncan v. Forgey, 25 Mo. App. 310, 312: Mackey v. Hyatt, 42 Mo. App. 443, 448; Fagley v. Tail, 11 Mo.
Read the full summary
Appeal from the St. Louis City Circuit Court. — Hon. James E. Withrow, Judge. (1) This court has no jurisdiction of this case, as the appeal has not been perfected as required by the statutes, there being no final judgment, and the statute requiring a bond to be given in appeals of this character. R. S. 1889, sec. 562 ; Jordan v. Wickham, 21 Mo. App. 536; Duncan v. Forgey, 25 Mo. App. 310, 312: Mackey v. Hyatt, 42 Mo. App. 443, 448; Fagley v. Tail, 11 Mo. App. 601; Metzenberger v. Keil, 31 Mo. App. 130 ; Toung v. Hudson, 99 Mo. 102, 105; Wirt v. Dinan, 41 Mo. App. 236, 242. (2) The…
1Opinion of the CourtRombauer, P. J.
Plaintiff filed its affidavit for ■attachment in November, 1889, alleging as grounds for .attachment of defendant’s property that he had concealed himself so that the ordinary process of law could not be served upon him; that he had absconded or absented himself from his usual place of abode in this state, so that the ordinary process of law could not be .served upon him, and also both an effected and an *640attempted fraudulent disposition, conveyance, concealment and assignment of Ms property. The defendant filed his plea in abatement, and upon the trial thereof the jury rendered a verdict for…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Norvell v. PorterSupreme Court of Missouri · 1876
- Young v. HudsonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1889
- Chariton County v. MoberlySupreme Court of Missouri · 1875
- Duncan v. ForgeyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1887
- Ellington v. MooreSupreme Court of Missouri · 1853
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Gast Bank Note & Lithograph Co. v. Fennimore Ass'nSupreme Court of Missouri · 1899
- Rosenthal v. WindensohlerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1905
- Louis Obert Brewing Co. v. KellerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1913