Legal Opinion

Gast Bank Note & Lithograph Co. v. Fennimore Ass'n

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided February 7, 1899PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Appeal from 81. Louis City Circuit Court. — Hof. John M. Wood, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtBurgess, J.

— This is an injunctive proceeding’ .against certain employees of the plaintiff and other persons who are alleged to have been carrying on a strike to restrain them from interfering with the plaintiff’s other workmen or otherwise disturbing its business affairs.

A preliminary injunction was granted upon the filing of the petition, and summons issued against all of the defendants, returnable to the October term, 1895, of the circuit court of the city of St. Louis by one of whose judges the preliminary writ was issued.

Before the return day of the writs some of the defendants filed answers in the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Kitchell v. Manchester Road Electric Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1898
  2. Paddock-Hawley Iron Co. v. GrahamMissouri Court of Appeals · 1892

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Marx & Haas Jeans Clothing Co. v. WatsonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1902
  2. Aufderheide v. Polar Wave Ice & Fuel Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1928
  3. Simmons v. FridaySupreme Court of Missouri · 1949
  4. State ex rel. Union Electric Light & Power Co. v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1914
  5. Frank Schmidt Planing Mill Co. v. MuellerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1941

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API