Legal Opinion

Byers v. South Carolina Alcoholic Beverage Control Commission

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided April 23, 1984No. 0161PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Cureton, Judge:

The respondents, Byers and Smith, petitioned the South Carolina Alcoholic Beverage Control Commission for a permit to sell beer and wine at The Hayloft, a club they contemplated purchasing. The Commission denied the petition on the ground that the location was unsuitable. The circuit court reversed the Commission’s decision, finding there was no evidence of the unsuitability of the location and thus the decision was clearly erroneous in view of the substantial evidence. The Commission appeals.

The Commission first argues that the circuit court erred in concluding that the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Lark v. Bi-Lo, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1981
  2. Law v. Richland County School District No. 1Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1978
  3. Smith v. PrattSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1972
  4. Taylor v. LewisSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1973

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Home Health Services, Inc. v. South Carolina Department of Health & Environmental ControlCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1989
  2. PORT OIL COMPANY v. AllenCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1985
  3. Kan Enters., Inc. v. S.C. Dep't of RevenueCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2017
  4. Moore v. South Carolina Alcoholic Beverage Control CommissionCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API