Legal Opinion
State Ex Rel. Bartlett v. Miller
California Court of Appeal
Decided January 19, 2016No. B259472PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
PERLUSS, P. J.
— Robert G. Bartlett appeals from the order entered after the trial court granted the State of California’s motion to dismiss his amended qui tam 1 complaint, filed on behalf of himself and the State of California (State) under the False Claims Act (CFCA) (Gov. Code, § 12650 et seq.), 2 alleging ClubCorp Porter Valley Country Club, Inc., and several related ClubCorp entities (collectively ClubCorp) had defrauded the State by failing to escheat the unclaimed initiation deposits of ClubCorp’s members and former members. The trial court ruled Bartlett’s qui tam action was…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Barnhart v. ThomasSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- Rockwell International Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Hughes Aircraft Co. v. United States Ex Rel. SchumerSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Graham County Soil & Water Conservation District v. United States Ex Rel. WilsonSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
- Reno v. BairdCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Center for Local Government Accountability v. City of San DiegoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
- Riske v. Superior Court of Los Angeles CountyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
- Tanner v. Public Employees' Retirement SystemCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
- County of Los Angeles v. Financial Casualty & Surety, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2016
- California Fire-Roasted v. Olam West Coast CA3California Court of Appeal · 2021
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.