Legal Opinion
Riske v. Superior Court of Los Angeles County
California Court of Appeal
Decided December 12, 2016No. B270043PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
PERLUSS, P. J.
Robert Riske, a retired Los Angeles police officer, sued the City of Los Angeles (City) alleging the Los Angeles Police Department (Department) had retaliated against him for protected whistleblower activity by failing to assign or promote him to several positions, selecting instead less qualified candidates. Riske filed a discovery motion pursuant to Evidence Code sections 1043 and 1045, which establish procedures for the disclosure of confidential personnel records of peace officers, to obtain certain records of the officers selected for the positions to which he had…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Pitchess v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- Ash v. Tyson Foods, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2006
- People v. MoocCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- (PC) Henderson v. LizzaragaDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2020
- Klean W. Hollywood, LLC v. Superior Court of L. A. Cnty., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
- People v. Super. Ct. (Lalo)California Court of Appeal · 2025
- Ramos v. Funding Rush, Inc.District Court, E.D. California · 2025
- Riske v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2018
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.