Legal Opinion

United States v. Perez

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided May 16, 2008No. 07-10289PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BEA, Circuit Judge:

We are called upon in this case to decide whether a person on supervised release has a right to cross-examine the laboratory technician who tested a urine sample containing an illegal drug, where: (1) the test report itself stated the sample was “dilute” 1 — meaning the urine sample had been combined with another liquid at some point before or during the testing; (2) the evidence presented showed the person on supervised release did not have an opportunity herself to dilute nor add a substance to the sample; and (3) the result of the urinalysis was critical to support a…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. United States v. William Lewis HallCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
  3. United States v. Daniel Douglas MartinCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
  4. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Dale Eric HAVIER, Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
  5. United States v. Hector Verduzco, AKA Andres Juan Gutierrez, Jr., AKA John DoeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. United States v. HarveyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
  2. United States v. Jewel AquinoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
  3. United States v. Jeffrey HilgerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
  4. United States v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2024
  5. United States v. David XinidakisCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API