United States v. David Xinidakis

MEMORANDUM ***

David Xinidakis appeals the district court’s revocation of supervised release, claiming there was insufficient evidence for the court to find he had committed the crime of stalking in violation of CaLPenal Code § 646.9(a) and (b). Because a preponderance of evidence shows Xinidakis intended to place his victim in reasonable fear for her safety, we affirm.

I

“We review the district court’s decision to revoke a term of supervised release for an abuse of discretion.” United States v. Perez, 526 F.3d 543, 547 (9th Cir.2008). “A district court may revoke a term of supervised release…