Legal Opinion

United States v. Jeffrey Hilger

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided August 26, 2013No. 12-30192PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

McKEOWN, Circuit Judge:

In criminal prosecutions, where guilt must be established beyond a reasonable doubt, the Supreme Court requires a conviction to rest on more than the uncorroborated confession of the defendant. Opper v. United States, 348 U.S. 84, 75 S.Ct. 158, 99 L.Ed. 101 (1954). The question here is whether the same standard should be extended to revocation of supervised release.

Jeffrey Hilger was on supervised release after a child pornography conviction. After he confessed to repeatedly violating restrictions on contact with minors, the district court revoked his supervised…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Opper v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
  3. United States v. Raul Lopez-AlvarezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
  4. United States v. SpangleCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
  5. United States v. PerezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. United States v. Joshua RileyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2019
  2. United States v. Andrew HulenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
  3. State v. Graham MacKerMontana Supreme Court · 2014
  4. Hartmann v. Attorney General of State of DelawareDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 2023
  5. State v. McGillCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2014

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API