Legal Opinion

Ex Parte Lost Creek Coal & Mineral Land Co.

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided June 7, 1934No. 6 Div. 517PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THOMAS, Justice.

The petition for mandamus sought to require the circuit judge to vacate his decree of July 3, 1933, opening and modifying the final decree rendered on January 4, 1933, which concluded as follows: “It is further ordered, adjudged and decreed that in the event that the complainant shall effectuate the redemption authorized by this decree within 30 days from this date, the cost of this cause shall be taxed against and paid by the defendants herein. If the complainant shall fail to perfect the redemption authorized by this decree icithin 30 days from the date hereof, that the cost…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. de Graffenried v. BreitlingSupreme Court of Alabama · 1915
  2. Ex Parte GreenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1930
  3. Gibson v. Farmers' Bank of LuverneSupreme Court of Alabama · 1929
  4. Howard v. RidgewaySupreme Court of Alabama · 1932
  5. Anderson v. SteinerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1927

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Ex Parte SharpSupreme Court of Alabama · 1953
  2. Cedrom Coal Co. v. MossSupreme Court of Alabama · 1935
  3. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co. v. EstesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1938
  4. Williams v. KnightSupreme Court of Alabama · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API