Legal Opinion

Molnor v. Commercial Casualty Insurance

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided December 5, 1933No. 7583PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Litz, Judge:

Plaintiff complains of judgment entered upon a directed verdict in favor of defendant.

The action is based upon a provision in an accident-health-insurance policy stipulating for payment to the insured of $500.00 for ‘ ‘ permanent loss of the entire use of both hands, or both feet, or one hand and one foot, ’ ’ caused by illness.

Plaintiff suffered a paralytic stroke while the policy was. in effect resulting, admittedly, in permanent loss of the entire use of his right hand and the greatly impaired use of his. right foot. The issue, therefore, is whether he has lost the- entire use…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Foglesong v. Modern Brotherhood of AmericaMissouri Court of Appeals · 1906
  2. Industrial Mutual Indemnity Co. v. HawkinsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1910
  3. McCutchen v. Pacific Mut. Life Ins.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1929
  4. Cody v. Insurance Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1932
  5. Marchant v. New York Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1930

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. White v. Aetna Life InsuranceWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1936
  2. Bosworth v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API