Legal Opinion

Bosworth v. Metropolitan Life Insurance

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided March 6, 1934No. 7768PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Litz, Judge:

This is an action to recover benefits under two insurance policies of $1,000.00 each. One is an accident policy. The other is a life policy containing a disability clause applying to “bodily injury or disease”. To the judgment entered upon a verdict in favor of plaintiff for the full amount of the policies, defendant prosecutes error.

The accident policy stipulates that payment will be made to the assured for the total and irrecoverable loss of sight of both eyes due to “violent and accidental means”. The life policy containing a disability clause provides for payment of benefits…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. McCutchen v. Pacific Mut. Life Ins.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1929
  2. United States Casualty Co. v. PerrymanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1919
  3. Jones v. Rinehart & Dennis Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1933
  4. Cody v. Insurance Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1932
  5. Monahan v. Supreme Lodge of the Order of Columbian KnightsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1903

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Order of United Commercial Travelers v. KnorrCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1940
  2. Lockhart v. State Compensation CommissionerWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1934
  3. Golden v. Lerch Bros. Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1941
  4. Brinson v. Old Republic Life Insurance CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
  5. Golden v. Lerch Bros. Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API