Legal Opinion

Chapman v. NYK LINE NORTH AMERICA, INC.

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided April 6, 2009No. 35014PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtW. Jones, J.

Merrie Chapman, flk/a Merrie Lockyer, (Chapman), appeals from the Industrial Commission’s finding that she engaged in misconduct and is therefore ineligible for unemployment benefits. Chapman appeals to this Court contending that (1) the Industrial Commission abused its discretion when it denied her an evidentiary hearing, and (2) the findings which resulted in her ineligibility for unemployment benefits are not supported *180by substantial and competent evidence. Chapman’s former employer, NYK Line North America (N.Y.K Line), requests attorney’s fees on appeal.

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

Cha…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Uhl v. Ballard Medical Products, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 2003
  2. White v. Idaho Forest IndustriesIdaho Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Beaty v. City of Idaho FallsIdaho Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Teevan v. Office of Attorney General, Natural Resources Division, State of IdahoIdaho Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Quinn v. J.R. Simplot Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1998

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Ginther v. Boise Cascade Corp.Idaho Supreme Court · 2010
  2. Chapman v. NYK LINE NORTH AMERICA, INC.Idaho Supreme Court · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API