Legal Opinion

Rieger v. Rieger, 21784 (5-11-2007)

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided May 11, 2007No. 21784PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

{¶ 1} Respondent-appellant Joseph Rieger appeals pro se from an order of the trial court denying his motion to seal the record of a consensual civil protection order (CPO) issued against him. For the following reasons, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

I

{¶ 2} In 1998 petitioner-appellee Cathy Rieger sought a CPO against Mr. Rieger, to whom she had been married. With the advice of counsel, Mr. Rieger consented to the issuance of a CPO for a period of five years. One year after the CPO expired, Mr. Rieger filed a motion asking the trial court to seal the record of the CPO. The…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Rieger v. RiegerOhio Court of Appeals · 2006

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Rieger v. Montgomery County Clerk of Courts, 22575 (1-30-2009)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2009
  2. Hashash v. Food Mart Plus, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2017
  3. Hosta v. Chrysler, 2008 Ca 35 (8-29-2008)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2008
  4. In re H.L.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2020
  5. State v. Doran, 22290 (2-1-2008)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API