Legal Opinion

Rieger v. Montgomery County Clerk of Courts, 22575 (1-30-2009)

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided January 30, 2009No. 22575PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

{¶ 1} Joseph M. Rieger appeals, pro se, from a judgment of the Montgomery County Court of Common Pleas, which dismissed his claim against the Montgomery County Clerk of Courts for defamation and for violation of a federal statute regarding the posting of protective orders on the Internet.

{¶ 2} For the following reasons, the judgment of the trial court will be affirmed.

I

{¶ 3} In 1998, with the advice of counsel, Rieger consented to a civil protection order ("CPO") requested by his former wife. The CPO remained in effect for five years. After the CPO expired, Rieger asked the trial court…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Beer v. GriffithOhio Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Kelly v. WhitingOhio Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Blankenship v. EnrightOhio Court of Appeals · 1990
  4. Baker v. Cuyahoga Cty. Court of Common PleasOhio Court of Appeals · 1989
  5. Rieger v. RiegerOhio Court of Appeals · 2006

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Miller v. Van Wert Cty. Bd. of Mental Retardation & Dev. DisabilitiesOhio Court of Appeals · 2009
  2. Reynolds v. KammOhio Court of Appeals · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API