Rieger v. Montgomery County Clerk of Courts, 22575 (1-30-2009)
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
{¶ 1} Joseph M. Rieger appeals, pro se, from a judgment of the Montgomery County Court of Common Pleas, which dismissed his claim against the Montgomery County Clerk of Courts for defamation and for violation of a federal statute regarding the posting of protective orders on the Internet.
{¶ 2} For the following reasons, the judgment of the trial court will be affirmed.
I
{¶ 3} In 1998, with the advice of counsel, Rieger consented to a civil protection order ("CPO") requested by his former wife. The CPO remained in effect for five years. After the CPO expired, Rieger asked the trial court…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Beer v. GriffithOhio Supreme Court · 1978
- Kelly v. WhitingOhio Supreme Court · 1985
- Blankenship v. EnrightOhio Court of Appeals · 1990
- Baker v. Cuyahoga Cty. Court of Common PleasOhio Court of Appeals · 1989
- Rieger v. RiegerOhio Court of Appeals · 2006
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Miller v. Van Wert Cty. Bd. of Mental Retardation & Dev. DisabilitiesOhio Court of Appeals · 2009
- Reynolds v. KammOhio Court of Appeals · 2025