Legal Opinion

Hosta v. Chrysler, 2008 Ca 35 (8-29-2008)

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided August 29, 2008No. Nos. 2008 CA 35, 2008 CA 36Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

{¶ 1} Elizabeth Hosta, Susan Chrysler, Roy Baker, and Marion Brooks ("Plaintiffs") appeal from orders of the Greene County Court of Common Pleas, which failed to require Jack Chrysler and William Chrysler ("Defendants") to serve them with a copy of a trust document and failed to order that Kil-Kare, Inc.'s newly-elected board of directors take control immediately. Defendants cross-appeal, arguing that the trial court erred in failing to ratify the actions of the sitting board of directors that were taken when the board believed that an injunction was not in effect and in holding that a…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Blakemore v. BlakemoreOhio Supreme Court · 1983
  2. National Amusements, Inc. v. City of SpringdaleOhio Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Rogers v. City of WhitehallOhio Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Pugh v. PughOhio Supreme Court · 1984
  5. Grover v. BartschOhio Court of Appeals · 2006

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API