United States v. Southern Pac. R.
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern California
In Equity.
1Opinion of the CourtBoss, J.
When these cases, which wore argued and submitted together, were before the court on demurrers to the amended bills, (39 *598Fed. Rep. 182,) it was held that the grant to the Atlantic & Pacific Railroad Company of date July 27, 1866, conferred upon that company no right of any nature to any particular piece of land within the indemnity limits of that grant prior to its selection, and, as a consequence, that the fact that lands were within such indemnity limits did not exclude them from the subsequent grant to the Southern Pacific Railroad Company of date March 3, 1871, because of that provision…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- California v. Central Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
- Newhall v. SangerSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
- Doolan v. CarrSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
- Higueras v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1865
- United States v. McLaughlinSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Louisville Trust Co. v. Louisville, N. A. & C. R. Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1896
- Southern Pac. R. v. BrownU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern California · 1895