Legal Opinion

Presley v. C. M. Allen & Co.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided September 26, 1951PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJoiiNsoN, J.

Tbe plaintiff offered evidence tending to show that on and prior to 14 July, 1948, tbe defendant contractor was and bad been engaged in excavating a ditcb for tbe purpose of laying underground cables for tbe telephone company along Main Street at and near tbe junction of Adams Street in the Town of Canton, where traffic was heavy. Tbe excavation extended from near the intersection of Main and Adams Streets westerly inside and along tbe paved portion of Main Street down to a point in Water Street an over-all distance of “two or three hundred feet.” Tbe project had been under way about two…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Murray v. . R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
  2. Ramsbottom v. RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1905
  3. Ramsbottom v. . RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1905
  4. Wood Ex Rel. Putnam v. Carolina Telephone & Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1948
  5. Watkins v. City of RaleighSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1939

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Johnson v. HeathSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  2. Petty v. Cranston Print Works CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
  3. CCT Equipment Co. v. Hertz CorporationSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
  4. Singletary v. NixonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  5. Estate of Klink Ex Rel. Klink v. StateHawaii Supreme Court · 2007

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API