Legal Opinion

In Re the Guardianship of Plowman

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided January 14, 1966PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice White

The sole issue involved in this appeal is whether the husband is obligated to account to. his wife during coverture for the rents and profits collected by him from real property owned by them as tenants by the entirety. The trial court held that he was not obligated to so account and we affirm for the reasons appearing herein.

Under the common law, where husband and wife are jointly seized of an estate in land, the husband during the marriage- acquires substantially the same rights and power of disposition of the estate thus held that he does in regard to the wife’s individual estate owned by…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Franz v. FranzMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1941
  2. Cole Manufacturing Co. v. CollierTennessee Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Arrand v. GrahamMichigan Supreme Court · 1941
  4. Alfred v. Bankers' Shippers' Ins. Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1934
  5. In Re the Estate of PerrySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Robinson v. Trousdale CountyTennessee Supreme Court · 1974
  2. The Citizens & Southern National Bank v. William A. Auer and Judith Auer, and the Richland Trust CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1981
  3. Weaks v. GressTennessee Supreme Court · 1971
  4. Third National Bank in Nashville v. KnoblerTennessee Supreme Court · 1990
  5. Mitchell v. Sinclair Refining Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1968

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API