Legal Opinion

Mitchell v. Sinclair Refining Co.

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided April 19, 1968PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Chattin

This suit was originally brought by Arthur F. Mitchell and wife, Mae P. Mitchell, against Sinclair Refining Company for damages to real estate owned by them as. tenants by the entirety.

A plea in abatement was filed which alleged the husband had executed an agreement which relieved defend*518ant from the damages sought. This agreement will be referred to later in this opinion.

The trial judge sustained the plea in abatement. On appeal, the Court of Appeals affirmed as to the husband; but held the plea in abatement did not raise the question the execution of the agreement by the husband alone barred…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Hall v. StephensSupreme Court of Missouri · 1877
  2. McCurdy & Stevenson v. CanningSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1870
  3. Cole Manufacturing Co. v. CollierTennessee Supreme Court · 1895
  4. Alfred v. Bankers' Shippers' Ins. Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1934
  5. Gill v. McKinneyTennessee Supreme Court · 1918

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Robinson v. Trousdale CountyTennessee Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Primestar Construction, Inc. v. City of Dallas, TexasTexas Supreme Court · 2018
  3. Robinson v. Trousdale CountyTennessee Supreme Court · 1974

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API