Legal Opinion

Harris v. Hill & Bridges

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided March 11, 1907No. 139PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Trover, from city court of Sylvester — Judge Park. April 9, 1906.

1Opinion of the CourtPowell, J.

Though many questions appear in the record, one is controlling. The plaintiff brought suit against the defendants for the recovery of a described cow and calf, claiming the same by virtue of what is known as a “statutory” or “short” homestead. In the schedule offered in support of the plaintiff’s title, there is listed “one cow and calf,” no other description being given. In settlement of a pending litigation, the plaintiff had sold the cow and calf in dispute to another person, who in turn sold it to the defendants. The defendants bought without any notice whatever of the exempt character of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Willingham v. SladeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1900
  2. Walden v. Brantley Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1902
  3. Weaver v. SaffoldSupreme Court of Georgia · 1897

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Arnold v. FaulkCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1917
  2. Clark v. PrinceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1928
  3. Barfield v. Reynolds Banking Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1929
  4. Worley v. ArnoldCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1947
  5. Byrd v. OlmsteadSupreme Court of Georgia · 1921

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API