Legal Opinion

Arnold v. Faulk

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided April 25, 1917No. 8232PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Levy and claim; from Twiggs superior court—Judge Kent. February 3, 1-916.

1Opinion of the CourtLuke, J.

1. In a statutory homestead the description of the property should be sufficiently definite to impart notice of the property homesteaded, and where a person in possession of property, in, 1914, representing the property to be free from liens and incumbrances, gave a mortgage on it, he will not be permitted to defeat the lien of the mortgage by claiming the property under a homestead granted in 1908, where the sole description of the homestead property was “one mule,” unless it be shown that the mortgagee liad actual notice that the mule, which was fully and particularly described in his…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Harris v. Hill & BridgesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1907

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Clark v. PrinceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1928
  2. Barfield v. Reynolds Banking Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1929
  3. Worley v. ArnoldCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1947

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API