Legal Opinion

Clark v. Prince

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided July 13, 1928No. 18548PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJenkins, P. J.

1. The bill of exceptions contains a sufficient assignment of error upon tile order of the court overruling the claimant’s motion for a new trial. Accordingly, the motion to dismiss the writ of error is denied.

2 In the ground of the motion for a new trial which complains of the court’s rejection of the homestead schedule of the claimant the alleged error is set forth sufficiently to present that question for determination, *413since it is stated therein the evidence was offered by the claimant and illegally withheld from the jury, and there is attached to the ground, as an exhibit, a copy of the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Morgan County Bank v. PoullainSupreme Court of Georgia · 1924
  2. Kendall v. ParkerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1916
  3. Harris v. Hill & BridgesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1907
  4. Arnold v. FaulkCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1917
  5. Collins v. Bank of CobbtownCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1924

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Caruthers v. Fleet Finance, Inc. (In Re Caruthers)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Georgia · 1988
  2. Worley v. ArnoldCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1947
  3. Felder v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API