Dreiband v. Candler
Michigan Supreme Court
Case by Benjamin Dreiband against James D. Candler and George Y. Candler, copartners as J. D. Candler & Company, for personal injuries. Judgment for defendants and plaintiff brings error. On motion of plaintiff’s attorneys to strike from the files a stipulation discontinuing the cause.
1Opinion of the CourtOstrander, C. J.
Benjamin Dreiband, in October, 1909, consulted with Sloman & Sloman, a firm of attorneys in the city of Detroit, in relation to a claim which the said Dreiband asserted against J. D. Candler & Co., arising out of a personal injury received by the said Dreiband while in the employ of the said J. D. Candler & Co. He made an agreement with Sloman & Sloman, which was reduced to writing, employing them to prosecute his said claim for damages against J. D. Candler & Co.; the concluding part of the agreement reading as follows:
“If you will accept said employment, I will agree to pay you for your…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Weeks v. Wayne Circuit JudgesMichigan Supreme Court · 1889
- Grand Rapids & Indiana Railroad v. Cheboygan Circuit JudgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1910
- Wildey v. CraneMichigan Supreme Court · 1886
- Line v. McCallMichigan Supreme Court · 1901
3Cited by10 opinions
- Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. StarkeyMichigan Court of Appeals · 1982
- Estate of RaphaelCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
- Department of Treasury v. CampbellMichigan Court of Appeals · 1981
- Miles v. KrainikMichigan Court of Appeals · 1969
- Shank v. LippmanMichigan Supreme Court · 1929
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.