Legal Opinion

Corbin v. Dailey, 08ap-802 (2-26-2009)

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided February 26, 2009No. 08AP-802PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

{¶ 1} Scott and Veronica Dailey, defendants-appellants, appeal two judgments of the Franklin County Municipal Court. In one judgment, the court, pursuant to a jury trial, rendered a verdict in favor of Victoria Corbin, plaintiff-appellee, on her claims of restitution of the premises and damages for breach of lease contract, and rendered a verdict in favor of appellee on appellants' counterclaims for retaliation and unjust enrichment/quantum meruit. In a subsequent judgment, the court denied appellants' motion for new trial. Appellee has also filed in this court an objection to…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Rose Chevrolet, Inc. v. AdamsOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Hummel v. HummelOhio Supreme Court · 1938
  3. State v. PayneOhio Court of Appeals · 2002
  4. State v. RenderOhio Supreme Court · 1975

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Stanley v. Ohio State Univ. Med. Ctr.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2013
  2. Columbus v. AMC Vision, V, L.L.C.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2021
  3. Ulrich v. Mercedes-Benz USA, L.L.C.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2010
  4. Hart v. HudsonOhio Court of Appeals · 2010
  5. Daily Servs., L.L.C. v. Ohio Bur. of Workers' Comp.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2013

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API