Legal Opinion

Ulrich v. Mercedes-Benz USA, L.L.C.

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided February 3, 2010No. 24740PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Whitmore, Judge.

{¶ 1} Defendant-appellant, Mercedes-Benz USA, L.L.C., appeals from the judgment of the Summit County Court of Common Pleas in favor of plaintiffappellee, Thomas Ulrich. This court affirms.

I

{¶ 2} This case has suffered from a lengthy procedural history. This court summarized this case’s pre-2005 history in Mercedes-Benz’s 2007 appeal as follows:

Appellee, Thomas Ulrich, filed a complaint against [Mercedes-Benz] regarding a Mercedes-Benz automobile, alleging two counts of breach of warranty under the Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act, and one count alleging a violation of Ohio’s lemon…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Blakemore v. BlakemoreOhio Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Rohde v. FarmerOhio Supreme Court · 1970
  3. O'Day v. WebbOhio Supreme Court · 1972
  4. Hoover v. SumlinOhio Supreme Court · 1984
  5. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. v. Aetna Cas. & Sur. Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 2002

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. FranksOhio Court of Appeals · 2017
  2. Williams v. Sharon Woods Collision Center, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2018
  3. Woodside Mgt. Co. v. BruexOhio Court of Appeals · 2020
  4. Tesar Indus. Contractors v. Republic SteelOhio Court of Appeals · 2018
  5. Norton v. Dominion Energy Servs., Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2021

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API