Legal Opinion

Eisenstadt v. Barron

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided February 10, 1969No. [Nos. 28 and 223, September Term, 1968.]PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.

Appellant (Eisenstadt) acquired land from one of the appellees (Barron) near Hagerstown. The deed recited that the land was “conveyed subject to the conditions, restrictions, reservations, easements, rights-of-way, and streets as shown on the aforesaid Plat, and subject also to the further condition that the lot conveyed herein shall have not more than one water connection to the water main in the bed of Redwood Circle, and that said water connection shall not be greater than one inch in diameter, and that said connecting water line shall be used solely for supplying water for the domestic…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Moore v. StevensSupreme Court of Florida · 1925
  2. Turner v. BrocatoCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1973
  3. Callaham v. ArensonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  4. McKenrick v. Savings BankCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1938
  5. Rock-Ola Manufacturing Corp. v. Music & Television Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1959

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Lowden v. BosleyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2006
  2. Sea Watch Stores Ltd. Liability Co. v. Council of Unit Owners of Sea Watch CondominiumCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1997
  3. Hanley v. MisischiSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1973
  4. Fassler v. Okemo Mountain, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1987
  5. Chestnut Real Estate Partnership v. HuberCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2002

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API