Legal Opinion
Fassler v. Okemo Mountain, Inc.
Supreme Court of Vermont
Decided October 30, 1987No. 87-120PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDooley, J.
This appeal concerns the interpretation of restrictive covenants in a residential development on Okemo Mountain. The trial court granted summary judgment that certain covenants were not violated by the defendant’s construction of a roadway across a lot in the development. The plaintiffs take issue with that determination. We affirm.
Defendant, Okemo Mountain, Inc., is the original owner and developer of several residential “cluster villages” constructed alongside ski trails that make up Okemo Mountain ski area. Plaintiffs, Fassler and Rossini, are the record owners of lots 38 and 41,…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Gore v. Green Mountain Lakes, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1981
- Vinyard v. St. Louis CountySupreme Court of Missouri · 1966
- Davidson v. VaughnSupreme Court of Vermont · 1945
- Braun v. HumistonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1981
- Donald E. Baltz, Inc. v. R. v. Chandler & Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1966
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Mann v. LevinSupreme Court of Vermont · 2004
- Creed v. ClogstonSupreme Court of Vermont · 2004
- Pelosi v. Wailea Ranch EstatesHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 1994
- Patch v. Springfield School DistrictSupreme Court of Vermont · 2009
- Morse v. MurphySupreme Court of Vermont · 1991
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.