Legal Opinion
Pirman v. Kurtz
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided December 28, 1943PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBliss, J.
This appeal comes to us on a shortened record after a trial by the court without a jury. The appellant does not question the facts as found by the trial court but claims that they do not support the conclusion and judgment which directed that Kurtz and Wynroth, the plaintiffs-respondents in action No. 2, recover of the defendant Ernest J. Pirman the sum of $500, with interest. If the findings of the trial court are contradictory, those most favorable to the appellant must be adopted on this appeal. (Schwinger v. Raymond, 83 N. Y. 192; Bonnell v. Griswold, 89 N. Y. 122.) It is necessary to…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Lawrence v. . MillerNew York Court of Appeals · 1881
- Schwinger v. . RaymondNew York Court of Appeals · 1880
- Page v. . McDonnellNew York Court of Appeals · 1873
- Bonnell v. . GriswoldNew York Court of Appeals · 1882
3Cited by4 opinions
- Procter & Gamble Distributing Co. v. Lawrence American Field Warehousing Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1965
- Simms v. BoveeDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1949
- Amtorg Trading Corp. v. Miehle Printing Press & Mfg. Co. of DelawareDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1952
- Handelman v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1973