Legal Opinion

Amtorg Trading Corp. v. Miehle Printing Press & Mfg. Co. of Delaware

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided August 29, 1952PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SUGARMAN, District Judge.

Amtorg Trading Corporation, (hereinafter called Amtorg), as plaintiff herein, and Miehle Printing Press & Manufacturing Company (of Delaware), (¡hereinafter called’Miehle), as defendant herein, each move for summary judgment. The complaint alleges six causes of action arising from dealings between the ' parties after Amtorg and Miehle’,s predecessor contracted for the sale to Amtorg of thirty printing presses, twenty of which for reasons hereinafter set forth, Amtorg refused to accept. For all purposes herein, Miehle’s rights and obligations under the contract and…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Cohens v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1821
  2. American MacHine & Metals, Inc. v. De Bothezat Impeller Co., IncCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1950
  3. D'Aprile v. Turner-Looker Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1925
  4. Miehle Printing Press & Manufacturing Co. v. Amtorg Trading Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1951
  5. Pirman v. KurtzAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1943

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Amtorg Trading Corp. v. Miehle Printing Press & Mfg. Co. (Of Delaware)Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1953
  2. Oksa v. American Employers InsuranceDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1954

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API