Legal Opinion

Parmly v. Farrar

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided January 16, 1903PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Assumpsit .—Appeal from the Superior Court of Cook County; the Hon. Axel Chytraus, Judge presiding. Heard in the Branch Appellate Court at the October term, 1901.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Freeman

This is an appeal from a judgment for $5,000 entered pursuant to the verdict of a jury assessing appellee’s damages at that sum.

The suit is brought in assumpsit under the common counts, upon an alleged verbal contract. Appellee states that he was by a written document given the exclusive agency, for thirty days, to effect a sale of Boone Block, Chicago, for $250,000; that upon appellee’s refusal of the contract on those terms and its return to appellant, the latter abandoned the limitation as to time, saying to appellee, “ never mind the thirty days; go ahead and sell it; ” that subsequently…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Parmly v. FarrarIllinois Supreme Court · 1897
  2. Parmly v. FarrarAppellate Court of Illinois · 1896

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Norkevich v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1931
  2. John F. Fleming, Incorporated v. Clarence A. Beutel and American National Bank and Trust Co. Of ChicagoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1968
  3. Parmly v. FarrarIllinois Supreme Court · 1903
  4. City of Elgin v. NofsAppellate Court of Illinois · 1904
  5. Campbell v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy RailroadAppellate Court of Illinois · 1943

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API