Legal Opinion

Parmly v. Farrar

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided November 8, 1897PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Appeal from the Appellate Court for the First District;—heard in that court on appeal from the Superior Court of Cook county; the Hon. Arthur H. Chetlain, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Craig

This was an action of assumpsit, brought by J. H. Farrar, a real estate broker, against Samuel P. Parmly, to recover the sum of $5000, commissions agreed to be paid, as is alleged, Farrar by Parmly, for procuring the sale of the Boone Block, in Chicago, to W. D. Walker. Three trials were had, the first resulting in a verdict for $3000 and the second in a verdict for $2500. New trials were granted in each of these. The third trial resulted in a verdict for $5000, the amount claimed by plaintiff, and judgment was rendered thereon, from which defendant appealed to the Appellate Court, where the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Eggleston v. BuckIllinois Supreme Court · 1860
  2. Parmly v. FarrarAppellate Court of Illinois · 1896

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Lawrence v. RhodesIllinois Supreme Court · 1900
  2. Snyder v. FidlerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1904
  3. Parmly v. FarrarIllinois Supreme Court · 1903
  4. Doherty v. Schipper & Block, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1910
  5. Columbus Safe-Deposit Co. v. BurkeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1898

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API