Legal Opinion

Patton Paint Co. v. Sunset Paint Co.

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided June 4, 1923No. 1545PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SMITH, Acting Associate Justice.

In 1897 the assignor and predecessor in interest of the Patton Paint Company registered as a trademark for its paints a serrated representation of the sun, hearing the words “Patton’s Sun-Proof Paints,” the essential parts of which mark were declared.to be the arbitrarily selected word “Sun-Proof” and a conventionalized picture of the sun. In 1915 the company registered in the Patent Office, as a trade-mark for its ready mixed paints and painters’ materials, a face in a serrated circle, from the upper and low-. er part of which comet-like rays or streamers…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Columbia Mill Co. v. AlcornSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
  2. Manufacturing Co. v. TrainerSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
  3. Lapointe Machine Tool Co. v. J. N. Lapointe Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1916
  4. Galena-Signal Oil Co. v. W. P. Puller & Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern California · 1906

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Sun Banks of Florida, Inc., a Florida Corporation Etc. v. Sun Federal Savings and Loan Association, a Federal Savings and Loan AssociationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
  2. Mishawaka Rubber & Woolen Mfg. Co. v. S. S. Kresge Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1941
  3. Sun-Maid Raisin Growers v. MosesianCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927
  4. Mishawaka Rubber & Woolen Mfg. Co. v. Panther-Panco Rubber Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1946
  5. California Prune & Apricot Growers' Ass'n v. H. R. Nicholson Co.California Court of Appeal · 1945

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API