Legal Opinion

Weniger v. Famous-Barr Co.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided February 19, 1985No. Nos. 48050, 48051PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KAROHL, Presiding Judge.

This opinion follows a retransfer of this cause from the Supreme Court for reconsideration in light of its holding in Sanders v. Daniel International Corporation, 682 S.W.2d 803 (Mo. banc 1984).

Defendant-appellant Famous-Barr appeals a verdict and judgment for plaintiff on her malicious prosecution claim contending there was no evidence to prove Famous-Barr had instigated the prosecution and there was no evidence of malice. Plaintiff-respondent Shirley Weniger cross-appeals claiming instruction error in the use of defendant-appellant’s converse instruction on the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Sanders v. Daniel International Corp.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1984
  2. Hoene v. Associated Dry Goods CorporationSupreme Court of Missouri · 1972
  3. Haswell v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1977
  4. Hughes v. Aetna Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1953
  5. Palermo v. CottomMissouri Court of Appeals · 1975

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Heartland Stores, Inc. v. Royal Insurance Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1991
  2. Simpson ex rel. Simpson v. Revco Drug Centers of Missouri, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1985
  3. Wolford v. United States Leasing Corp.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1985
  4. Burnett v. GriffithSupreme Court of Missouri · 1989
  5. Burnett v. GriffithSupreme Court of Missouri · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API