Weniger v. Famous-Barr Co.
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
KAROHL, Presiding Judge.
This opinion follows a retransfer of this cause from the Supreme Court for reconsideration in light of its holding in Sanders v. Daniel International Corporation, 682 S.W.2d 803 (Mo. banc 1984).
Defendant-appellant Famous-Barr appeals a verdict and judgment for plaintiff on her malicious prosecution claim contending there was no evidence to prove Famous-Barr had instigated the prosecution and there was no evidence of malice. Plaintiff-respondent Shirley Weniger cross-appeals claiming instruction error in the use of defendant-appellant’s converse instruction on the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Sanders v. Daniel International Corp.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1984
- Hoene v. Associated Dry Goods CorporationSupreme Court of Missouri · 1972
- Haswell v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1977
- Hughes v. Aetna Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1953
- Palermo v. CottomMissouri Court of Appeals · 1975
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Heartland Stores, Inc. v. Royal Insurance Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1991
- Simpson ex rel. Simpson v. Revco Drug Centers of Missouri, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1985
- Wolford v. United States Leasing Corp.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1985
- Burnett v. GriffithSupreme Court of Missouri · 1989
- Burnett v. GriffithSupreme Court of Missouri · 1989