Burnett v. Griffith
Supreme Court of Missouri
1Opinion of the Court
769 S.W.2d 780 (1989)
Karl E. BURNETT, Respondent-Appellant,
v.
Roger GRIFFITH, et al., Appellants-Respondents.
No. 69147.
Supreme Court of Missouri, En Banc.
May 16, 1989.
Ronald M. Sokol, St. Joseph, for respondent-appellant.
George A. Barton, Kansas City, Robert Randolph, St. Joseph, for appellants-respondents.
ROBERTSON, Judge.
This consolidated appeal arises out of a suit for assault and battery, false imprisonment and malicious prosecution. The plaintiff, Karl Burnett, sued Roger Griffith, a security guard, and Griffith's employers, East Hills Merchants' Association and Belt Highway Investment…
Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part · Rendlen; Concurring in part, dissenting in part · Rendlen.
2Cases cited44 opinions
- Rawlings v. ApodacaArizona Supreme Court · 1986
- Burnett v. GriffithSupreme Court of Missouri · 1989
- Sanders v. Daniel International Corp.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1984
- McGinnis v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1906
- Firestone v. Crown Center Redevelopment Corp.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1985
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.