Legal Opinion

Hoene v. Associated Dry Goods Corporation

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided November 13, 1972No. 55885PublishedCited by 67 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HENRY I. EAGER, Special Commissioner.

In this action for malicious prosecution plaintiff recovered a verdict of $500 actual damages and $20,000 puriitive damages. Defendant duly appealed. The notice of appeal was filed here before the effective date of the amendment increasing the jurisdiction of the Courts of Appeal to $30,000, Laws 1969, 3rd Ex.Sess., p. 110, § 1; and, of course, it was filed prior to the Amendment of our Judicial Article, effective January 1, 1972. We have jurisdiction:

Defendant insists that a verdict should have been directed for it, so we shall need to relate the evidence…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Beggs v. Universal CIT Credit CorporationSupreme Court of Missouri · 1966
  2. State Ex Rel. St. Joseph Belt Railway Co. v. ShainSupreme Court of Missouri · 1937
  3. Gathright v. PendegraftSupreme Court of Missouri · 1968
  4. Jones v. West Side Buick Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1936
  5. Stubbs v. MulhollandSupreme Court of Missouri · 1902

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by67 opinions

  1. Callahan v. Cardinal Glennon HospitalSupreme Court of Missouri · 1993
  2. Sanders v. Daniel International Corp.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1984
  3. Pierce v. Platte-Clay Electric Cooperative, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1989
  4. Fahy v. Dresser Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1987
  5. Labrier v. Anheuser Ford, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1981

62 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API