Legal Opinion

People v. Lopez

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 21, 1921No. Crim. No. 753PublishedCited by 3 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtShaw, J.

Defendant was charged with committing the offense designated in section 288 of the Penal Code and, upon conviction thereof, appealed from the judgment of imprisonment which followed.

The prosecuting witness was a female child, six years of age and the stepdaughter of defendant, with whom and her mother she was accustomed to occupy the same bed. The act with which defendant is charged is alleged to have occurred about a month prior to the filing, of the information. The verdict is based largely upon the child’s testimony, given through an interpreter, to the reception of which evidence, on…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. People v. CraigCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  2. People v. HornCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1914
  3. People v. HardenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1914

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. People v. ParkerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925
  2. People v. SmithCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
  3. Gulf, C. & S. F. Ry. Co. v. HinesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1927

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API