People v. Harden
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco and from an order refusing a new trial, George IT. Cabaniss, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
THE COURT.
The defendant in this case after two trials was convicted of the felony defined by section 288 of the Penal Code. He was sentenced to twelve years confinement in the state prison at San Quentin. The appeal is from the judgment and the order denying him a new trial.
The information generally follows the language of the statute defining the crime of which the defendant was convicted.
A reversal is urged primarily upon the ground of the insufficiency of the evidence to support the verdict. Incidentally it is insisted that the trial court abused its discretion in permitting the child…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- People v. BensonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1856
- People v. BaldwinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
- People v. CraigCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
- People v. HamiltonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1873
- People v. BernalCalifornia Supreme Court · 1858
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- People v. FremontCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
- People v. ReyesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
- People v. StewartCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
- People v. PollockCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
- People v. LopezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.