Legal Opinion

People v. Horn

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 7, 1914No. Crim. No. 266PublishedCited by 20 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Humboldt County and from an order refusing a new trial. George D. Murray, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtHart, J.

The defendant .was charged by information with statutory rape, alleged to have been committed by one Orville Taggart, aided and abetted by her, upon the person of one May Bartol, in the county of Del Norte, on or about the eighth day of February, 1913, and the jury adjudged her guilty of ah. attempt to commit the crime so charged, and thereupon, as punishment for the crime, the court sentenced her to imprisonment for a term of four years in the state penitentiary.

This appeal is by the defendant from the judgment and the order denying her a new trial.

The information charges that, on the day…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. People v. BartolCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1914
  2. People v. HamiltonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1873
  3. People v. HoosierCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1914
  4. State v. MitchellSupreme Court of Kansas · 1895

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. People v. RamirezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
  2. Lightfoot v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1976
  3. People v. AndersonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925
  4. Wilkins v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1940
  5. People v. ParkerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API