Legal Opinion

Rimledge Uranium & Mining Corp. v. Federal Resources Corp.

Utah Supreme Court

Decided August 22, 1962No. 9604PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CALLISTER, Justice.

Plaintiffs instituted this suit for an accounting of royalties due from defendants and for a declaratory judgment as to the ■proper basis for determining the royalties. From a summary judgment in favor of defendants, plaintiffs appeal.

In 1953 Robert B. Daniel and A. T. Pryor, Sr. located upon the Colorado Plateau some mining claims known as the “Radon group.” In the same year these locators executed a mining deed to one Reuckhaus, as trustee, in which was reserved “a royalty of fifteen per cent (15%) of all gross proceeds from the sale of ore from said claims, the gross…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Matzen v. Hugoton Production Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1958
  2. Danciger Oil & Refineries, Inc. v. Hamill Drilling Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1943
  3. Barton W. Freeland v. Sun Oil Company and Cities Service Oil Company Sohio Petroleum Company, IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1960
  4. Warfield Natural Gas Co. v. AllenCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1935
  5. Western Etc. Oil Co. v. Title Insurance & Trust Co.California Court of Appeal · 1949

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Ewan v. ButtersUtah Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Emery Resource Holdings, LLC v. Coastal Plains Energy, Inc.District Court, D. Utah · 2012
  3. Frank Richardson v. Homestake Mining Company, a California CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1963
  4. Holley v. Federal-American PartnersUtah Supreme Court · 1973
  5. Holley v. Federal-American PartnersUtah Supreme Court · 1973

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API