Legal Opinion

Frank Richardson v. Homestake Mining Company, a California Corporation

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided September 3, 1963No. 7244PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BRATTON, Circuit Judge.

Frank R. Richardson and others instituted this action against Homestake Mining Company, a corporation, and the determinative issue between the parties was the basis upon which the defendant was obligated to pay royalty to the plaintiffs under a lease covering certain unpatented mining claims located in San Juan County, Utah. The lease provided for payment of a royalty of fifteen per cent of the gross value of the ores, minerals and metals extracted from the land. And it defined gross value to mean the net returns derived from the sales of ores, minerals, and metals…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Nevada Half Moon Mining Co. v. Combined Metals Reduction Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1949
  2. Rimledge Uranium & Mining Corp. v. Federal Resources Corp.Utah Supreme Court · 1962

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Colorado Coal Furnace Distributors, Inc. v. Prill Manufacturing Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1979
  2. Emery Resource Holdings, LLC v. Coastal Plains Energy, Inc.District Court, D. Utah · 2012
  3. Holley v. Federal-American PartnersUtah Supreme Court · 1973
  4. Ca 79-2978 Colorado Coal Furnace Distributors, Inc., a Colorado Corporation, Plaintiff-Appellant/cross-Appellee v. Prill Manufacturing Company, a Wyoming Corporation, Defendant-Appellee/cross-Appellant v. Jack Steele, Don Steele, Steel T Heating Inc., and Colorado Coal Distributors, Inc., a Colorado Corporation, Counter-Defendants/appelleesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1979
  5. Holley v. Federal-American PartnersUtah Supreme Court · 1973

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API