Legal Opinion

Gaita v. Pamula

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 16, 1956No. Appeal, 131PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Arnold,

In this action of trespass plaintiff-wife appeals from the refusal of her motion for a new trial, but the plaintiff-husband did not appeal. The action arises out of a collision between defendant’s automobile and that of plaintiff’s husband in which the wife ivas a passenger. The husband was joined as an additional defendant.

On July 4, 1952, plaintiffs, residents of Pittsburgh, were visitors in Erie, and at the time of the accident were driving towards the motel where they were staying. The husband was driving, and occupying the front seat with him were his wife…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Paustenbaugh v. Ward Baking Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1953
  2. Ray v. PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1942
  3. Joseph v. Rochester Motor Coach Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1955

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Kiser v. SchulteSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
  2. Neison v. HinesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  3. Burbage v. Boiler Engineering & Supply Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1969
  4. Cantwell v. Allegheny CountySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  5. Morrissey v. Department of HighwaysSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1967

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API