Legal Opinion

In Re DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc., ASR Hip Implant Products Liability Litigation

United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation

Decided December 3, 2010No. MDL No. 2946PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

TRANSFER ORDER

DAVID R. HANSEN, Acting Chairman.

Before the Panel * : Five motions are currently pending before the Panel, pursu ant to 28 U.S.C. § 1407, seeking centralization of this litigation in the Southern District of Texas or the Northern District of Alabama. Defendants 1 support centralization of all cases involving an ASR XL Acetabular Hip System in the Northern District of Indiana, the Northern District of Ohio, or the District of New Jersey.

Responding plaintiffs in various potential tag-along actions also propose centralization in the following districts: the Central and the Northern…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. In Re Plumbing Fixture CasesUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 1968
  2. In Re Westinghouse Electric Corporation Uranium Contract LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 1977
  3. In Re ClassicStar Mare Lease LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 2007
  4. In re Food Fair Securities LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 1979

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Wright v. DePuy Orthopaedics, IncDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API