Legal Opinion

Martin v. City of Rome

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided December 22, 1914No. 6037PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Certiorari; from Floyd superior court—Judge Wright. October 29, 1914.

1Opinion of the CourtBroyles, J.

Will Martin was convicted in the recorder’s court of the city of Borne of violating a city ordinance which prohibited the keeping of intoxicating liquors for the purpose of sale or barter. There were six or seven other defendants charged with the same offense, and the witness who testified against Martin was also the witness in the other cases. Martin and the other defendants were all present in court at the same time. The defendants had separate counsel, and these counsel were also present in court. When Lawrence, who was the principal witness for the State in all these cases, was put upon…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Woolfolk v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1890
  2. Tucker v. Buffalo Cotton MillsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1907
  3. Alabama Construction Co. v. Continental Car & Equipment Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1908
  4. Sawyer v. City of BlakelyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1907
  5. M'Cleskey v. LeadbetterSupreme Court of Georgia · 1846

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Sable v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1918
  2. Smith v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1915
  3. Elzie v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1917
  4. Montgomery v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1929
  5. Morris v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API