Sitzman v. John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance Co.
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtBryson, J.
This is an action by an insured for dismemberment benefits under a group insurance policy. Judgment was rendered for defendant after the court sustained a demurrer to plaintiff’s complaint on the ground it failed to state a cause of action. The plaintiff appeals.
Plaintiff, an insured and minor dependent of Deane D. Sitzman, was injured in a vehicular collision. He submitted a claim to defendant which was denied. Plaintiff commenced this action under the dismemberment clause of the policy alleging:
*
“IV.
“Under the terms of said policy Defendant insured dependents of Deane D. Sitzman against the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Gowans v. Northwestern Pacific Indemnity Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1971
- Moore v. Ætna Life InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1915
- Chalmers v. OREGON AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANYOregon Supreme Court · 1972
- Reliance Insurance Company v. KinmanSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1972
3Cited by19 opinions
- Shadbolt v. Farmers Insurance ExchangeOregon Supreme Court · 1976
- Andrew L. Cunninghame v. The Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1981
- James B. Francis, Jr. v. Ina Life Insurance Company of New York, a Cigna Company, A/K/A LiconyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1987
- Martha Valerio v. Home Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1996
- Neer v. Fireman's Fund American Life InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1985
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.