Legal Opinion

Sitzman v. John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance Co.

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided May 23, 1974PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBryson, J.

This is an action by an insured for dismemberment benefits under a group insurance policy. Judgment was rendered for defendant after the court sustained a demurrer to plaintiff’s complaint on the ground it failed to state a cause of action. The plaintiff appeals.

Plaintiff, an insured and minor dependent of Deane D. Sitzman, was injured in a vehicular collision. He submitted a claim to defendant which was denied. Plaintiff commenced this action under the dismemberment clause of the policy alleging:

*

“IV.
“Under the terms of said policy Defendant insured dependents of Deane D. Sitzman against the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Gowans v. Northwestern Pacific Indemnity Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Moore v. Ætna Life InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1915
  3. Chalmers v. OREGON AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANYOregon Supreme Court · 1972
  4. Reliance Insurance Company v. KinmanSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1972

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Shadbolt v. Farmers Insurance ExchangeOregon Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Andrew L. Cunninghame v. The Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1981
  3. James B. Francis, Jr. v. Ina Life Insurance Company of New York, a Cigna Company, A/K/A LiconyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1987
  4. Martha Valerio v. Home Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1996
  5. Neer v. Fireman's Fund American Life InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1985

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API