Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

State v. Floyd

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided July 5, 1994No. 9312SC764Published

1Opinion of the Court

445 S.E.2d 54 (1994)

115 N.C. App. 412

STATE of North Carolina

v.

Deano Donday FLOYD.

No. 9312SC764.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

July 5, 1994.

Atty. Gen. Michael F. Easley by Asst. Atty. Gen. William F. Briley, Associate Attys. Gen. Elizabeth Leonard McKay and Lisa C. Bland, Raleigh, for State.

Appellate Defender Malcolm R. Hunter, Jr. by Asst. Appellate Defender Gordon Widenhouse, Durham, for defendant appellant.

ARNOLD, Chief Judge.

Defendant first argues that the prosecutor impermissibly used peremptory challenges to excuse prospective jurors based upon their race. The record reveals that the…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Gamble v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1987
  3. State v. PorterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1990
  4. State v. SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1991
  5. State v. GreeneSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API