State v. Floyd
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
ARNOLD, Chief Judge.
Defendant first argues that the prosecutor impermissibly used peremptory challenges to excuse prospective jurors based upon their race. The record reveals that the prosecutor challenged five of five prospective black jurors, and that defendant timely objected to each challenge..When asserting a claim of racial discrimination in jury selection defendant must first make out a prima facie case of racial discrimination. Defendant makes a prima facie case by showing that (1) he is a member of a racial minority, (2) that members of his race were peremptorily excused, and (3)…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- State v. PorterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1990
- State v. SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1991
- State v. GreeneSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
- State v. BraceySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- State v. BreezeCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1998
- State v. PetersonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2010
- State v. FloydCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1994