Legal Opinion

In re Antisdel

District Court, D. Michigan

Decided April 29, 1878PublishedCited by 2 opinions

[In bankruptcy. Application by James S. Antisdel a bankrupt, for discharge. On specifications filed by the Union National Bank, a creditor of the bankrupt, setting forth objections to his discharge, as follows: (1) That the bankrupt had willfully and intentionally concealed his title to certain real estate and personal property which belonged to him, by having the same conveyed to his wife at a time when he was insolvent, and knew himself to be' so, and when he expected and…

Read the full summary

[In bankruptcy. Application by James S. Antisdel a bankrupt, for discharge. On specifications filed by the Union National Bank, a creditor of the bankrupt, setting forth objections to his discharge, as follows: (1) That the bankrupt had willfully and intentionally concealed his title to certain real estate and personal property which belonged to him, by having the same conveyed to his wife at a time when he was insolvent, and knew himself to be' so, and when he expected and contemplated proceedings in bankruptcy;' (2) that the bankrupt, being a country merchant, did not keep proper books of…

1Opinion of the Court

BROWN, District Judge.

Substantially three objections are made to the bankrupt’s books of account. 1. That they did not exhibit the condition of his business, that no trial balance could be made from them, and that Antisdel’s individual account was unintelligible. 2. That there were unexplained mutilations and erasures. 3. That he had omitted to credit two or three small amounts, and had made false entries of advances to his wife.

With regard to the first objection, I fully concur in the opinion of Judge Longyear in the case of In re Archenbrown, [Case No. 505,] that the books of account of a…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Humes v. ScruggsSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  2. Phipps v. SedgwickSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  3. Hodson v. McConnelIllinois Supreme Court · 1850
  4. Bradley v. HunterSupreme Court of Alabama · 1874
  5. Downer v. RowellSupreme Court of Vermont · 1853

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In re FreyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1881
  2. In re GravesDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1885

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API